Archives
- By thread 1472
-
By date
- August 2019 59
- September 2019 118
- October 2019 165
- November 2019 97
- December 2019 35
- January 2020 58
- February 2020 204
- March 2020 121
- April 2020 172
- May 2020 50
- June 2020 158
- July 2020 85
- August 2020 94
- September 2020 193
- October 2020 277
- November 2020 100
- December 2020 159
- January 2021 38
- February 2021 87
- March 2021 146
- April 2021 73
- May 2021 90
- June 2021 86
- July 2021 123
- August 2021 50
- September 2021 68
- October 2021 66
- November 2021 74
- December 2021 75
- January 2022 98
- February 2022 77
- March 2022 68
- April 2022 31
- May 2022 59
- June 2022 87
- July 2022 141
- August 2022 38
- September 2022 73
- October 2022 152
- November 2022 39
- December 2022 50
- January 2023 93
- February 2023 49
- March 2023 106
- April 2023 47
- May 2023 69
- June 2023 92
- July 2023 64
- August 2023 103
- September 2023 91
- October 2023 101
- November 2023 94
- December 2023 46
- January 2024 75
- February 2024 79
- March 2024 104
- April 2024 63
- May 2024 40
- June 2024 160
- July 2024 80
- August 2024 70
- September 2024 62
- October 2024 121
- November 2024 117
- December 2024 89
- January 2025 59
- February 2025 104
- March 2025 96
- April 2025 107
- May 2025 52
- June 2025 72
- July 2025 60
- August 2025 81
- September 2025 124
- October 2025 63
- November 2025 57
- December 2025 33
- January 2026 63
- February 2026 48
Contributors
contributors@odoo-community.org
-
Re: Address format in SEPA XML files
My understanding was that vanilla odoo can only support the hybrid format, because for the more detailed format you need street and housenumber separated, which you either need to guessculate or you need to use an oca module to have the data differently in your db, which not all customers have. So i think the hybrid format is a better default. But Alexis might have a different view?
by Tom Blauwendraat - 09:15 - 17 Dec 2025 -
Re: Address format in SEPA XML files
Le mar. 16 déc. 2025 à 10:57, Victor Champonnois <notifications@odoo-community.org> a écrit :--We are not ready to deploy your "big" PR in production yet. So we will isolate the part of the code that makes the correction in a separate PR. Is it OK for you if we propose this PR to the OCA ?
Of course ! Feel free to take code from OCA/bank-payment-alternative to improve OCA/bank-payment !BTW, you don't need to ask my permission, the AGPL licence permits you to do that ; you just have to keep the name of the authors of the code.Alexis de Lattre
by Alexis de Lattre - 04:06 - 17 Dec 2025 -
Re: Address format in SEPA XML files
Yes sorry for not responding, we worked from Alexis's PR and made this PR : https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1535
This enforces the structured format, not the hybrid format as in your PR. I don't know which is best though.
Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy
On 16/12/25 14:03, Tom Blauwendraat wrote:
Victor, it would be nice if you can respond to the comment that I made on there. So that maybe the PR can be simplified
by Victor Champonnois - 04:41 - 16 Dec 2025 -
Re: Address format in SEPA XML files
Yes, it's my colleague's PR, it's the work I mentionned. He was quicker than I planned ^^
Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy
On 16/12/25 14:02, Pedro M. Baeza wrote:
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Victor Champonnois - 04:41 - 16 Dec 2025 -
Re: Address format in SEPA XML files
We had started on something here:
https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1528
Victor, it would be nice if you can respond to the comment that I made on there. So that maybe the PR can be simplified
On 12/16/25 10:57, Victor Champonnois wrote:
Thank you for your reply Alexis.
We are not ready to deploy your "big" PR in production yet. So we will isolate the part of the code that makes the correction in a separate PR. Is it OK for you if we propose this PR to the OCA ?
Have a nice day,
Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy
On 30/10/25 11:12, Alexis de Lattre wrote:
Dear Victor,
I was aware of this change from unstructured addresses to structured addresses in SEPA XML files, as described in the EPC specs. To anticipate this change, I worked on it in august 2024, cf this commit on account_banking_pain_base https://github.com/akretion/banking/commit/e0ccf2d734c1aaea5e26f826c030eb57d392b04f
On v16.0, structured addresses in SEPA credit transfer XML files and SEPA direct debit XML files is implemented in my "big" PR here : https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1174I am fully aware of the problem with the separation of street name and number. I didn't want account_banking_pain_base to depend on base_address_extended, because it would be a very big impact for a very small need.My implementation strategy was the following :- if base_address_extended is installed, it use the fields added by that module- if base_address_extended is not installed, I separate street number and street name "on the fly" with code. It's not always perfect, it works most of the time and, when it doesn't work, the street number is empty and the street name has the whole street field.Cf the code :you can have a look at the method _improved_street_split() at line 99.
Look at the test suite to see the result with real life content :
In 18.0, it is implemented in OCA/bank-payment-alternative (which was created from my "big" PR on 16.0 #1174) :The only change is that the module account_banking_pain_base has been renamed to account_banking_sepa_base.
Porting this on OCA/bank-payment should be pretty easy.
Alexis
Le jeu. 30 oct. 2025 à 10:27, Victor Champonnois <notifications@odoo-community.org> a écrit :
Hello OCA Contributors,
There is an ongoing change in the european regulation regarding the format of address in Sepa direct debit and Sepa credit transfer XML files. See here for the presentation of the regulation and here for the full spec.Banks in Belgium are already rejecting some XML files generated from the version 12 and 16 of account_banking_sepa_credit_transfer.
There are two possible formats : structured and hybrid. Using the structured format doesn't seem possible because it requires the street name and number to be separated. In Odoo both pieces of information are in the same field. The hybrid format should therefore be used, but from what I see, the XML files already seem to be consistent with this format.
Have you encountered the same problems ? Or do you have more information about this issue ?
Thank you and have a nice day,
-- Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Tom Blauwendraat - 02:00 - 16 Dec 2025 -
-
Re: Address format in SEPA XML files
Thank you for your reply Alexis.
We are not ready to deploy your "big" PR in production yet. So we will isolate the part of the code that makes the correction in a separate PR. Is it OK for you if we propose this PR to the OCA ?
Have a nice day,
Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy
On 30/10/25 11:12, Alexis de Lattre wrote:
Dear Victor,
I was aware of this change from unstructured addresses to structured addresses in SEPA XML files, as described in the EPC specs. To anticipate this change, I worked on it in august 2024, cf this commit on account_banking_pain_base https://github.com/akretion/banking/commit/e0ccf2d734c1aaea5e26f826c030eb57d392b04f
On v16.0, structured addresses in SEPA credit transfer XML files and SEPA direct debit XML files is implemented in my "big" PR here : https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1174I am fully aware of the problem with the separation of street name and number. I didn't want account_banking_pain_base to depend on base_address_extended, because it would be a very big impact for a very small need.My implementation strategy was the following :- if base_address_extended is installed, it use the fields added by that module- if base_address_extended is not installed, I separate street number and street name "on the fly" with code. It's not always perfect, it works most of the time and, when it doesn't work, the street number is empty and the street name has the whole street field.Cf the code :you can have a look at the method _improved_street_split() at line 99.
Look at the test suite to see the result with real life content :
In 18.0, it is implemented in OCA/bank-payment-alternative (which was created from my "big" PR on 16.0 #1174) :The only change is that the module account_banking_pain_base has been renamed to account_banking_sepa_base.
Porting this on OCA/bank-payment should be pretty easy.
Alexis
Le jeu. 30 oct. 2025 à 10:27, Victor Champonnois <notifications@odoo-community.org> a écrit :
Hello OCA Contributors,
There is an ongoing change in the european regulation regarding the format of address in Sepa direct debit and Sepa credit transfer XML files. See here for the presentation of the regulation and here for the full spec.Banks in Belgium are already rejecting some XML files generated from the version 12 and 16 of account_banking_sepa_credit_transfer.
There are two possible formats : structured and hybrid. Using the structured format doesn't seem possible because it requires the street name and number to be separated. In Odoo both pieces of information are in the same field. The hybrid format should therefore be used, but from what I see, the XML files already seem to be consistent with this format.
Have you encountered the same problems ? Or do you have more information about this issue ?
Thank you and have a nice day,
-- Victor Champonnois - Coop IT Easy_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Victor Champonnois - 09:56 - 16 Dec 2025 -
OCA news + New mailing lists
Dear contributors,
In the future, we won't use the contributor mailing list to promote OCA events and activities.We want this mailing to keep its main goal :This group is meant for both OCA contributors (members or not) to discuss the development of OCA projects. It can serve as a place to exchange on project roadmaps, discuss cross project issues...If you want to be informed about the OCA and its activities, you can:- become a member and receive the emails sent to our members
- subscribe to the Newsletter
- subscribe to specific mailing lists
NEW MAILING LISTS
Crowdfunding news
This mailing list is dedicated to follow the news regarding the challenges of the Crowdfunding platform. Receive information about the new challenges and the evolution of an ongoing challenges.
Support Group Sessions | Consultants
This mailing list is dedicated to the communications around the OCA Support Group Sessions for Consultants
Webinars for members
This mailing list is dedicated to exchanges around the webinars past and future.
Thank you and have a great day.--Julie LeBrunExecutive Director, Content Creator & Training ManagerGitHub : https://github.com/TumbaoJu
by Julie LeBrun (OCA) - 05:15 - 15 Dec 2025 -
Exclusive Look at the Open Source Experience 2025 Visitor List
Hi,
I hope you're doing well.
We are pleased to present an opportunity to expand your professional engagement at the Open Source Experience 2025, scheduled for 10 - 11 Dec 2025 at The Palais des Congres in Paris, Paris, France.
A verified list of 6,638 pre-registered attendees is available to support your outreach, helping you connect with industry professionals, solution providers, and potential business partners throughout the exhibition.
Contact information and professional emails
Company names and websites
Job titles, designations, and mobile numbers etc.
Would you be interested in receiving details about accessing the attendee list along with the fee information?
Yes, I'm interested, please share the exclusive fee and additional information
No, thank you
Looking forward to your response.
Thanks & Regards
Scott Andrew
by "Scott Andrew" <scott.andrew.leadsnova@gmail.com> - 12:11 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Hello Daniel,In case you are on 16.0, we have added major improvements to stock_valuation_fifo_lot to achieve specific identification in https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-workflow/pull/1676. It's been in production use with no major issues.Best regards,--Yoshi TashiroQuartileOn Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 5:02 PM Richard deMeester <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:Hi Daniel,
On version 18.0+, there is a field "lot_valuated" (only visible for products with tracking).
lot_valuated = fields.Boolean(
"Valuation by Lot/Serial number",
compute='_compute_lot_valuated', store=True, readonly=False,
help="If checked, the valuation will be specific by Lot/Serial number.",
)I think that is what you are looking for?Richard
From: Frederik Kramer <notifications@odoo-community.org>
Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2025 6:52 PM
To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing Real CostHi Daniel,
afaik there is also AVCO (Average Costing) but there is no LIFO (even if that would be allowed in many localisations). I am not aware of anyone or any module that has touched this and i personally would issue that reqirement directly to Odoo instead of developing something one by one, because that is very core to accounting compliance
Best Frederik
Am 04.12.25 um 08:32 schrieb Daniel Reis:
Hello,
Odoo supports FIFO costing, but this is not the same as real cost.
For example, when using Lots, I can buy lot A and then Lot B.
If I choose to consume Lot B first, it will carry the purchase cost of Lot A.
As far as I know this is a common request from customers, but I couldn't find an existing implementation for it.
Is there anything I missed out there?
Thank you!
--
DANIEL REIS
MANAGING PARTNER>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M: +351 919 991 307
E: dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517 Cascais_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
-- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH Innungsstraße 7 21244 Buchholz i.d.N. Tel: +49 (0) 4181 13503 12 Fax: +49 (0) 4181 13503 10 Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Internet: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N. Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Yoshi Tashiro - 10:15 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Daniel wasn't asking for LIFO, but for what he calls "real cost", which seeing the description, I think it's a valuation by lots.Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 09:26 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Hi Pedro, just to get it right / complete, even though valuation by lots i more precisely what most companies would use today, LIFO still isn't among the list of options if i am not mistaken. So companies that use this valuation method still have no other choice then to switch to one of the supported methods - AVCO - FIFO and - Valuation by Lots right? Or are you aware of any LIFO implementation Best Frederik Am 04.12.25 um 09:02 schrieb Pedro M. Baeza: > Odoo has implemented cost by lot in Odoo 18+, so nothing extra to do > except configuring it AFAIK. > > https://www.odoo.com/documentation/19.0/applications/inventory_and_mrp/inventory/inventory_valuation/valuation_by_lots.html > > Regards. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15 > Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org > Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe > -- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH Innungsstraße 7 21244 Buchholz i.d.N. Tel: +49 (0) 4181 13503 12 Fax: +49 (0) 4181 13503 10 Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Internet: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N. Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
by Frederik Kramer. - 09:21 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Hi Daniel,
On version 18.0+, there is a field "lot_valuated" (only visible for products with tracking).
lot_valuated = fields.Boolean(
"Valuation by Lot/Serial number",
compute='_compute_lot_valuated', store=True, readonly=False,
help="If checked, the valuation will be specific by Lot/Serial number.",
)I think that is what you are looking for?Richard
Kind regards,Richard deMeesterDevelopment QAWilldooIT is a member of the PNORS Technology Group.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Although reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, no responsibility is accepted by PNORS Technology Group Pty Ltd or its related entities for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. Any views expressed in this email or file attachments are those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of PNORS Technology Group Pty Ltd or any of its related entities.
From: Frederik Kramer <notifications@odoo-community.org>
Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2025 6:52 PM
To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing Real CostHi Daniel,
afaik there is also AVCO (Average Costing) but there is no LIFO (even if that would be allowed in many localisations). I am not aware of anyone or any module that has touched this and i personally would issue that reqirement directly to Odoo instead of developing something one by one, because that is very core to accounting compliance
Best Frederik
Am 04.12.25 um 08:32 schrieb Daniel Reis:
Hello,
Odoo supports FIFO costing, but this is not the same as real cost.
For example, when using Lots, I can buy lot A and then Lot B.
If I choose to consume Lot B first, it will carry the purchase cost of Lot A.
As far as I know this is a common request from customers, but I couldn't find an existing implementation for it.
Is there anything I missed out there?
Thank you!
--
DANIEL REIS
MANAGING PARTNER>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M: +351 919 991 307
E: dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517 Cascais_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
-- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH Innungsstraße 7 21244 Buchholz i.d.N. Tel: +49 (0) 4181 13503 12 Fax: +49 (0) 4181 13503 10 Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Internet: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N. Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by "Richard deMeester" <richard.demeester@willdooit.com> - 09:01 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Odoo has implemented cost by lot in Odoo 18+, so nothing extra to do except configuring it AFAIK.Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 09:01 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Hi Daniel,
afaik there is also AVCO (Average Costing) but there is no LIFO (even if that would be allowed in many localisations). I am not aware of anyone or any module that has touched this and i personally would issue that reqirement directly to Odoo instead of developing something one by one, because that is very core to accounting compliance
Best Frederik
Am 04.12.25 um 08:32 schrieb Daniel Reis:
Hello,
Odoo supports FIFO costing, but this is not the same as real cost.
For example, when using Lots, I can buy lot A and then Lot B.
If I choose to consume Lot B first, it will carry the purchase cost of Lot A.
As far as I know this is a common request from customers, but I couldn't find an existing implementation for it.
Is there anything I missed out there?
Thank you!
--
DANIEL REIS
MANAGING PARTNER>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M: +351 919 991 307
E: dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517 Cascais_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
-- Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer Geschäftsführer initOS GmbH Innungsstraße 7 21244 Buchholz i.d.N. Tel: +49 (0) 4181 13503 12 Fax: +49 (0) 4181 13503 10 Mobil: +49 (0) 179 3901819 Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com Internet: www.initos.com Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buchholz i.d.N. Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226 USt-IdNr.: DE815580155 Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
by Frederik Kramer. - 08:51 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Re: Implementing Real Cost
Hi Daniel, for Romania we have done more related to FIFO, like FIFO per location and lot valuated started from v14.0 in l10n_ro_stock_account, and also Odoo has starting from 18.0 i think the possibility for lot_valuated.Best Regards.,Mihai Fekete
NextERP Romania S.R.L.
600B, Peciu Nou, Romania
E-mail: feketemihai@nexterp.ro
Telefon: 0788-749989
Website: https://nexterp.roOn Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 9:32 AM Daniel Reis <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:Hello,
Odoo supports FIFO costing, but this is not the same as real cost.
For example, when using Lots, I can buy lot A and then Lot B.
If I choose to consume Lot B first, it will carry the purchase cost of Lot A.
As far as I know this is a common request from customers, but I couldn't find an existing implementation for it.
Is there anything I missed out there?
Thank you!
--
DANIEL REIS
MANAGING PARTNER>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M: +351 919 991 307
E: dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517 Cascais_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
by Mihai Fekete - 08:46 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Implementing Real Cost
Hello,
Odoo supports FIFO costing, but this is not the same as real cost.
For example, when using Lots, I can buy lot A and then Lot B.
If I choose to consume Lot B first, it will carry the purchase cost of Lot A.
As far as I know this is a common request from customers, but I couldn't find an existing implementation for it.
Is there anything I missed out there?
Thank you!
--
DANIEL REIS
MANAGING PARTNER>> Schedule time on my calendar.
M: +351 919 991 307
E: dreis@OpenSourceIntegrators.com
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office Center, 2649-517 Cascais
by Daniel Reis - 08:31 - 4 Dec 2025 -
Model hr_work_entry for LATAM (RRHH)
Hello Community, I have a question that you may have already seen.
I'm currently evaluating the adoption of the hr.work.entry module in my company (inHuman Resources :), but after reviewing its workflow and features, I'm wondering if this module is primarily designed with European regulations in mind. Is it truly suitable for the Latin American work context, where time and schedule management is more flexible?
Are there any adaptations or best practices for its implementation in Latin America?
I've reviewed some documentation and the app store, and I see that there aren't many third-party modules that have customized this model.
I would greatly appreciate your help and comments.
Regards--
by DANIEL CARRION - 11:06 - 3 Dec 2025 -
Re: Text Maintenance in Orders
You can use base_comment_template and make a simple extension:Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 08:56 - 3 Dec 2025 -
Re: Proposing camptocamp/odoo-repository modules to OCA
Hello,The repository has been moved to https://github.com/OCA/odoo-repositoryAnd its PR to declare it: https://github.com/OCA/repo-maintainer-conf/pull/126Thank youOn Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 8:32 AM Simone Orsi <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:Moving to OCA is a good idea!I can handle that. Just ping me when you are ready ;)On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 4:57 PM Sébastien Alix <notifications@odoo-community.org> wrote:Thanks for your message.Yes, I still want to maintain these modules, this is only a transfer of ownership.Regarding the transfer itself, only OCA people with some admin rights (or repository creation) are able to do it, I checked and I cannot. But I'll ask to Simone, he should be able to do it :+1Hi,
thanks for your message.
I don't know your modules. I'll take a look on the video
A question : do you want to be the maintainers of this repo, or are you looking for new maintainers ?
A remarque : regarding migration, I transfered the ownership of repo from grap to OCA (https://github.com/OCA/odoo-module-migrator), and all you have to do is to go to the setting page, and click on the transfer section. The previous link (https://github.com/grap/odoo-module-migrator/) will continue to work.
Then a PR has to be done on OCA conf repo. (see https://github.com/OCA/repo-maintainer-conf/blob/master/conf/repo/odoo-community.yml#L9)----Sébastien AlixBusiness Solutions Software Developer_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
--Simone OrsiFull stack Python web developer, Odoo specialist, Odoo Community Board Member, in love with open source._______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
--Sébastien AlixBusiness Solutions Software Developer
by Sébastien Alix - 04:50 - 2 Dec 2025