Skip to Content
  2. Mailing Lists
  3. Contributors

Archives

  • Functional question: ISR based on customer [l10n_ch_payment_slip]
    Hi OCA,



    We are trying to understand and use this module for one of our customer based in Geneva:
    https://github.com/OCA/l10n-switzerland/tree/11.0/l10n_ch_payment_slip



    We would like to get an ISR reference depending on the res.partner (so that each time the same customer pays, he can use the same ISR reference, even if he has 5 different invoices).

    We found this documentation on the module about the ISR generation by Odoo:
    123456000000500002018000149
    \____/\_____/\___________/|
      1      2         3      4
    The ISR is a 27 interger long string that is created upon VALIDATION of an invoice. It consists of the following parts:
    (1) ISR-B Customer ID number (size: may vary) - this number identifies your company and is set in the bank account of your company’s partner as 'l10n_ch_isrb_id_number'.
    To set this number, create a bank and bank account through Contacts > Configuration. There, you can assign the created bank, your company and an ISR-B number to the bankaccount.
    (2) Partner reference filled by 0 on the left (size: 7) - this number is taken from the 'ref' field of a customer (partner).
    (3) Invoice reference filled by 0 on the left (size: what is left) - this number can be found (for the most part) in the name of an invoice
    (4) Control digit (size: 1)

    But our tests are not OK. For example, we have one partner with internal reference 999 and another with internal reference 001.
    For the 001 customer we generated 2 invoices, and it gave those 2 ISR:
    01 12341 00000 00002 02000 06921
    01 12341 00000 00002 02000 07941

    For the 999 partner, we generated 1 invoice and the BVR generated is:
    01 12341 00000 00002 02000 04980

    We don't see the partner internal reference in the generated BVR.

    What did we miss?

    Thanks a lot for your help,
    Virginie
    Coop IT Easy (Belgium)
    by Virginie Dewulf. - 09:55 - 25 Feb 2020

    1 replies 1 replies

    • Re: Functional question: ISR based on customer [l10n_ch_payment_slip]
      Hello Virginie,

      May I suggest you to put that kind of Switzerland specific question to switzerland@odoo-community.org

      To answer your question, the feature you are talking about has been done here:


      And it is only available since version 12.0. There is currently no short term plan to backport it to version 11.0. (as your link target the 11.0 branch I assume you need that in this version)

      You can try to backport it and make a pull request on https://github.com/OCA/l10n-switzerland.

      Best regards,
      Yannick Vaucher
      Business Solutions Architect

      Camptocamp SA
      PSE A, CH-1015 Lausanne
      Phone: +41 21 619 10 30
      Office: +41 21 619 10 10


      On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 09:56, Virginie Dewulf <virginie@coopiteasy.be> wrote:
      Hi OCA,



      We are trying to understand and use this module for one of our customer based in Geneva:
      https://github.com/OCA/l10n-switzerland/tree/11.0/l10n_ch_payment_slip



      We would like to get an ISR reference depending on the res.partner (so that each time the same customer pays, he can use the same ISR reference, even if he has 5 different invoices).

      We found this documentation on the module about the ISR generation by Odoo:
      123456000000500002018000149
      \____/\_____/\___________/|
        1      2         3      4
      The ISR is a 27 interger long string that is created upon VALIDATION of an invoice. It consists of the following parts:
      (1) ISR-B Customer ID number (size: may vary) - this number identifies your company and is set in the bank account of your company’s partner as 'l10n_ch_isrb_id_number'.
      To set this number, create a bank and bank account through Contacts > Configuration. There, you can assign the created bank, your company and an ISR-B number to the bankaccount.
      (2) Partner reference filled by 0 on the left (size: 7) - this number is taken from the 'ref' field of a customer (partner).
      (3) Invoice reference filled by 0 on the left (size: what is left) - this number can be found (for the most part) in the name of an invoice
      (4) Control digit (size: 1)

      But our tests are not OK. For example, we have one partner with internal reference 999 and another with internal reference 001.
      For the 001 customer we generated 2 invoices, and it gave those 2 ISR:
      01 12341 00000 00002 02000 06921
      01 12341 00000 00002 02000 07941

      For the 999 partner, we generated 1 invoice and the BVR generated is:
      01 12341 00000 00002 02000 04980

      We don't see the partner internal reference in the generated BVR.

      What did we miss?

      Thanks a lot for your help,
      Virginie
      Coop IT Easy (Belgium)

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Yannick Payot - 10:31 - 25 Feb 2020
  • GSSAPI support to connect Odoo 12 to MS Exchange
    Hello,

    I have a project where I need to connect Odoo 12 to Microsoft Exchange requiring GSSAPI for outgoing emails.

    Any experience or recommendation around this topic?

    Thank you.

    MAXIME CHAMBREUIL
    PROJECT MANAGER/CONSULTANT
    O: 1.855.877.2377 EXT. 710
    M: 602.427.5632
    E: MChambreuil@OpenSourcelntegrators.com
    P.O. BOX 940, HIGLEY, AZ 85236
    by Maxime Chambreuil - 04:46 - 24 Feb 2020

    11 replies 11 replies

  • Call for PayPal users
    Dear community,

    There are two PRs related to PayPal that could be useful to active PayPal users (e.g. B2C):
    https://github.com/OCA/bank-statement-import/pull/234 - adds support for automatic import of PayPal statements
    https://github.com/OCA/bank-statement-import/pull/236 - improves off-line importing of PayPal reports, yet doesn’t have backwards compatibility with previous mapping configurations

    It would be great to get more visibility as it’s really odd that such features are not in high demand.

    Kind regards,
    Alexey



    by Alexey Pelykh <alexey.pelykh@gmail.com> - 04:31 - 22 Feb 2020
  • Analytic Account: different currency than company 
    Dear community, 

Is there a module that would allow analytic account to have different currency than company?

Kind regards,
Alexey
    by Alexey Pelykh <alexey.pelykh@gmail.com> - 12:31 - 21 Feb 2020

    6 replies 6 replies

  • Salary Structures 
    Dear community,

Is there a good readme or explanation (or real-life examples) on salary structures and rules? It seems like a complete voodoo at first :D We’re diving into this part of Odoo for the first time

Kind regards,
Alexey
    by Alexey Pelykh <alexey.pelykh@gmail.com> - 03:36 - 19 Feb 2020

    1 replies 1 replies

    • Re: Salary Structures
      Hi Alexey,

      We (our "Numigiens") have worked for a long time for customers with payroll in several countries and continents. 
      It's interesting. The complexity and the legislation is very different from one country to another.

      Here in Canada, we invested it in 2014 with Savoir-faire Linux and the work was on hold in the following months. 
      We started again and "relaunch" last year at Numigi. It's fun!

      Depending on your localization, you can base yourself on different repositories, as (for example)

      I didn't find any readme or explanation about salary structures in Odoo Documentation.

      In short:
      - the salary structure corresponds to your models to build the pay slip. You can play with child structure to easier your management depends on complexity you have on your localization.
      - the rules corresponds to the different lines that make up the pay slip.
      In most cases, the lines are gross revenues, deductions...

      And you will find a lot of localization as l10n_ around payroll for helping yourself.

      Have fun and don't hesitate to share links or infos around this topic!


      Bruno Joliveau - Architecte applications - Président
      NUMIGI SOLUTIONS INC.
      (514) 317-7944

      Longueuil, Québec, Canada

      linkedinyoutubecustom-icontwitter


      Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 09:36, Alexey Pelykh <alexey.pelykh@gmail.com> a écrit :
      Dear community,

Is there a good readme or explanation (or real-life examples) on salary structures and rules? It seems like a complete voodoo at first :D We’re diving into this part of Odoo for the first time

Kind regards,
Alexey

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Bruno Joliveau - 09:05 - 22 Feb 2020
  • How to use /ocabot merge correctly?
    Dear community,

    We have seen this document, yet it not tell in great detail. https://odoo-community.org/blog/the-oca-blog-1/post/the-oca-github-bot-can-now-merge-pull-requests-92 so may we ask in detailed here,

    1) What is the difference between /ocabot merge patch/minor/major and the symantic of x.y.z - breaking.feature.fix in another document. Is it so that,
      - /ocabot merge patch, 13.0.1.0.0 -> 13.0.1.0.1 (patch = fix)
      - /ocabot merge minor, 13.0.1.0.0 -> 13.0.1.1.0 (minor = feature)
      - /ocabot merge major, 13.0.1.0.0 -> 13.0.2.0.0 (major = breaking)

    2) For the new [ADD] module, should be click merge manually, or use /ocabot merge (don't want to add any digit, but we test it and it seem to try to change last digit).

    3) What is "/ocabot merge" alone, it default to patch or minor?

    4) What is the practice to work with some module that has HISTORY. For example, some author (not the PSC), may add in history as new Minor revision, 13.0.1.0.0 -> 13.0.1.1.0 but the merger think it is just a fix. And so, he might do /ocabot merge patch . This could result in the version diff between HISTORY and manifest file?

    Thank you!
    Kitti U.





    by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 10:10 - 17 Feb 2020

    3 replies 3 replies

  • Github OCA do not have runbot and codecov in v13
    Dear contributors,

    Has been  experiences this a while now. For example,

    Only Travis seem working.
    Thank you,


    by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 09:11 - 17 Feb 2020

    3 replies 3 replies

  • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
    Lek, Bill and others,

    I was somewhat expecting some responses.

    My opinion anyway, that this is pretty emblematic of the OCA "functional" issue.  Lots of conversation "about them" but little visible response "to them".  3 functionals chimed in and no response other than this small micro eddy.

    Perhaps we coukd form a sub-group and see of we can outline issues, resources and methods for involvement to have clear paths and bridges between elements.

    Fog may not seem thick when you are in a forest.  From the outside, it is hard to find the landing strip none the less.

    Thoughts?  Methods?  I did log into the wiki referenced above.  Is there one "GitHub Issue" set that coukd be used as a focal point for discussion?

    hope to hear more.

    Landis Arnold


    From: Lek Ecosoft <wipawiij@ecosoft.co.th>
    Sent: Feb 13, 2020 7:57 PM
    To: Contributors
    Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

    Hello,


    I am pure blood functional, who cannot even query database. 

    Thank you all to talk about this topic and share many ideas/suggestions. This is a good example of opening space to talk and share but email or mailing list flows and gone, not suits as knowledge and content management.

    IMHO, functional consists of End Users and Implementor.

    If we talk about an End user, we should have place to chat and ask + knowledge or Content management because they want to decide to use our app or not. If so, how to use it > This should be Easy to access and find information > User documents, user manual.

    If we talk about functional Implementor, they should work as a team with technical. I think this group doesn't need Easy tool but it should be simple tool and simple way to work together. Functional spec or Requirements Spec is out of date for agile methodology, no longer writing this for technical. We need to discuss and share different aspects and ideas from Technical and functional then summarise, code and Test absolutely.

    > No doubt for runbot for testing but discussion, I would say

    > Wiki is easy but not in line with github which is powerful for technical and have to manage?

    > +1 github issue and link to google doc/sheet.

    Personally, github itself look scary for non-technical but not too difficult to use. Functional who really want to be in, they got strong passion to learn 'new world of techies'. They open thier mind to give and take. On the other hands, github will filter out Newbies because its structure. We have to accept that github born for technical. (Of I am not wrong)

    +1 Forum no reason, just experience it.

    ... TOTB...

    1. Let's try to change this thread topic to be Does OCA "really" need implementor functional and user?

     - If the answer is no, it's crystal clear. No need any action.
     - If your answer is yes, I believe you will find the way to let them it and be a part of team.

    2. Opensource is an area of technical or hybrid functional while Proprietary is an area of Functional, is this true?

    Last but not least, shall technical open mind to learn a new world of Functional?

    Thanks all.

    Regards,

    Wipawii

    www.ecosoft.co.th

    Your ERP Partner

    On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, 06:12 Bill Ennals, <bill@billennals.net> wrote:
    Hi Community,

    I’m also ‘mostly' functional.  I have no formal IT qualification or education but have self-taught the basics of administering a Ubuntu server and an Odoo CE installation for a small not-for-profit business (reversegarbageqld.com.au) in Australia.  I can’t really code, but I’m a stubborn googler and can do some low-level tinkering and can sometimes get to where I’m aiming for, sometimes not.

    It’s taken many years and we’re still only 50% implemented - no POS, public facing website, ecommerce and accounting yet, though all of that should be ready in the next six months.  Started on V7, open upgraded to v8, then leap frogged to V11 via a gruelling export/import process.  It’s been a crazy and unsustainable way to do it in many respects, but our hope is that the efficiency gains of using an integrated ERP will help to generate enough operational profit to be able to engage a professional local implementer, the costs of which (up until now at least) have been prohibitive.

    I agree with Landis about the welcoming landing place, and through all of this, the thing that I have most missed is a healthy discussion forum.  Having to piece together clues from the Odoo help forum (which is mostly awful), Stack Overflow, this mailing list and the patchy official documentation has absorbed hundreds of hours of my time, often for no return.  Sure, a comprehensive wiki would be awesome, but that would seem to require a gargantuan effort to make it any more useful than pointers to the current Github repositories.  Github is a little daunting and opaque for non-IT professionals, but it’s not terrible and a healthy community forum with a few good stickies about how to approach navigating the various parts of the Odoo universe for newbies would make it far less daunting.  If the standard of the ‘readme’s was improved, I think a separate wiki might be unnecessary duplication.

    Lastly (sorry for the long email), one comparable experience I’ve had lately is mucking about with custom roms on mobile devices, which I know nothing about apart from what I’ve learned from xda-developers.com.  Although it’s far from perfect, if I spend an hour there researching a particular topic or problem I’m having, I can feel pretty confident about whether it’s something that is worth pursuing, or if it’s just going to be a waste of my time, and therefore something I should drop altogther.  A combination of the stickies and guides for newbies, and the vibrant participation of the community there enables that.  I rarely feel that way after an hour of trying to figure out if a particular thing is possible in Odoo - more often I’m left with a bunch of unresolved questions.  Obviously the xda forums member base is huge, but if the Odoo claim about 4 million users is true, then a proper discussion forum should have something to work with - no?

    Bill.








    On 14 Feb 2020, at 12:21 AM, Landis Arnold <larnold@nomadic.net> wrote:

    Well, Being mostly "functional" I would say, first off, there needs to be a place to go and get information, ask questions, profer advise.  Documentation is important, even in Wiki form, but most important is a true and welvoming landing pad and place.  Branches should go out from there to subjects of the different repositories.

    As an example.  Information and sharing about upgrade paths and methods.  Fundamental changes, for users and system implementers about requirement changes generation to generation...  Is it possible to skip versions in upgrade sequencing.  say v 8, v10, v12, v14?  If so how?

    "Open" needs to be open and not obscure.  Installations and upgrades can be methodical and complex, but they must also be understandable. 

    Customization, which is essence, is what OCA is about, should be welcome, and also seen to be something that users can also do without creating a whole repository and running through a week of testing and approvals.  Interface changes, as an example, like moving an "add task" button to a project, or rearranging a menu interface etc.

    And on bigger customizations, how to have "funcionals" express a desire for a more efficient work flow.  A "wish list" is different than a "issue" until it becomes one.

    Anyway, it is an important subject, how to integrate "functionals" which really everyone is on some level.

    Landis Arnold
    Nomadic Inc
    Colorado USA


    Sent from Nine
    From: "Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa)" <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com>
    Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:47 AM
    To: Contributors
    Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?


    Jean-Charles, here there's no such OCA strategy of not wanting functional people, just as Lois says: there's no more physical time to perform what you want to do to attract more people. I still think laziness is a point, because some functional people have already contributed and be part of the community with a low barrier, but it's very easy to say "I'm not able to contribute because things are not easy". Think that we are all employees of a company that pays our time and have a lot of duties, and some of us have invested spare free time for trying to raise OCA, but this time is limited. So any of you can apply for being in the OCA board next year and conduct this, or simply arise at contributor for that specific task this year. My colleagues at board will love some help on this (I'm not anymore there due to the time restrictions I have and after being there during 3 years).

    Regards.
    <span id="cid:D10EFA06-18B5-49B7-9C55-57158B7F1E0A@home.gateway"><attachment>

    _______________________________________________
    Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
    Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
    Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

    _______________________________________________
    Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
    Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
    Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

    by Landis Arnold - 04:51 - 15 Feb 2020

    11 replies 11 replies

    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Hi,

      Meanwhile, is it easy just to have another group mail "functional@odoo-community.org", so we all can start asking functional questions related to OCA addons and Odoo. Then, we can see how much traction we have without investing anything.

      Note: As I saw it, the many groups we have almost no activity, except this one, may be because it is too topic specific. Having the generic one may help?

      Kitti



      On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:27 PM Maxime Chambreuil <mchambreuil@opensourceintegrators.com> wrote:
      Hello,

      1. I am not sure it matters. The ones it is intended to may not be here today, but hopefully will join in the future.

      2. What's wrong with the current mailing lists available at https://odoo-community.org/groups?

      3. @Stefano How long has this site been up? How many writers do you have? How often do they write? How many visits does it get per month on average?

      MAXIME CHAMBREUIL
      PROJECT MANAGER/CONSULTANT
      O: 1.855.877.2377 EXT. 710
      M: 602.427.5632
      E: MChambreuil@OpenSourcelntegrators.com
      P.O. BOX 940, HIGLEY, AZ 85236


      On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:17 AM Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> wrote:


      El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 9:02, Stefano Consolaro (<stefano.consolaro@mymage.it>) escribió:
      Well, after a couple of days I think that there are some points to check:
      1 Who we are? How many functional people are active in OCA and have theme to analyze?

      No idea, but I guess just a few. OCA is hard even for devs.
       
      2 What can be a tool to support a functional discussion?

      A matrix community, with rooms. It can be good for devs too.
       
      3 What can be a tool to document a flow

       Google docs. It allows reviewing and approving, just like git, but everyone knows how to use it, and functionals don't need to learn git nor that # this is a header and *this is italics* but **this is bold**.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 01:05 - 21 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Here you can find an idea of a task that functional people can do: Update the migration "issues", see  https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-reporting/issues/92  

      Un saludo,

      Eduardo Magdalena

      Fundador & CEO

      ✉   emagdalena@c2i.es

      ✆  +34 678 713 373

      		C2i Change 2 improve

      C2i Change 2 improve

      Optimización de procesos

          www.c2i.es

      Perfil en LinkedIn   Averigua a quién conocemos en común
      Onshape. El futuro del CAD   Odoo. Mucho más que un ERP   Integración CAD-ERP. Control de proyectos en tiempo real

      ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?

      AVISO LEGAL: Este mensaje y sus archivos adjuntos van dirigidos exclusivamente a su destinatario, pudiendo contener información confidencial sometida a secreto profesional. No está permitida su comunicación, reproducción o distribución sin la autorización expresa de Asociación Española de Odoo. Si usted no es el destinatario final, por favor, elimínelo e infórmenos por esta vía.

      PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS: De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Reglamento (UE) 2016/679, de 27 de abril (GDPR), y la Ley Orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre (LOPDGDD), le informamos de que los datos personales y la dirección de correo electrónico del interesado, se tratarán bajo la responsabilidad de CHANGE 2 IMPROVE OPTIMIZACION DE PROCESOS, S.L. por un interés legítimo y para el envío de comunicaciones sobre nuestros productos y servicios, y se conservarán mientras ninguna de las partes se oponga a ello. Los datos no se comunicarán a terceros, salvo obligación legal. Le informamos de que puede ejercer los derechos de acceso, rectificación, portabilidad y supresión de sus datos y los de limitación y oposición a su tratamiento dirigiéndose a Ponte nova 71  36204  - (Vigo) - Pontevedra o al email admin@c2i.es. Si considera que el tratamiento no se ajusta a la normativa vigente, podrá presentar una reclamación ante la autoridad de control en www.aepd.es.



      El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 15:27, Maxime Chambreuil (<mchambreuil@opensourceintegrators.com>) escribió:
      Hello,

      1. I am not sure it matters. The ones it is intended to may not be here today, but hopefully will join in the future.

      2. What's wrong with the current mailing lists available at https://odoo-community.org/groups?

      3. @Stefano How long has this site been up? How many writers do you have? How often do they write? How many visits does it get per month on average?

      MAXIME CHAMBREUIL
      PROJECT MANAGER/CONSULTANT
      O: 1.855.877.2377 EXT. 710
      M: 602.427.5632
      E: MChambreuil@OpenSourcelntegrators.com
      P.O. BOX 940, HIGLEY, AZ 85236


      On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:17 AM Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> wrote:


      El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 9:02, Stefano Consolaro (<stefano.consolaro@mymage.it>) escribió:
      Well, after a couple of days I think that there are some points to check:
      1 Who we are? How many functional people are active in OCA and have theme to analyze?

      No idea, but I guess just a few. OCA is hard even for devs.
       
      2 What can be a tool to support a functional discussion?

      A matrix community, with rooms. It can be good for devs too.
       
      3 What can be a tool to document a flow

       Google docs. It allows reviewing and approving, just like git, but everyone knows how to use it, and functionals don't need to learn git nor that # this is a header and *this is italics* but **this is bold**.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Eduardo Magdalena - 09:00 - 20 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Hello,

      1. I am not sure it matters. The ones it is intended to may not be here today, but hopefully will join in the future.

      2. What's wrong with the current mailing lists available at https://odoo-community.org/groups?

      3. @Stefano How long has this site been up? How many writers do you have? How often do they write? How many visits does it get per month on average?

      MAXIME CHAMBREUIL
      PROJECT MANAGER/CONSULTANT
      O: 1.855.877.2377 EXT. 710
      M: 602.427.5632
      E: MChambreuil@OpenSourcelntegrators.com
      P.O. BOX 940, HIGLEY, AZ 85236


      On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:17 AM Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> wrote:


      El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 9:02, Stefano Consolaro (<stefano.consolaro@mymage.it>) escribió:
      Well, after a couple of days I think that there are some points to check:
      1 Who we are? How many functional people are active in OCA and have theme to analyze?

      No idea, but I guess just a few. OCA is hard even for devs.
       
      2 What can be a tool to support a functional discussion?

      A matrix community, with rooms. It can be good for devs too.
       
      3 What can be a tool to document a flow

       Google docs. It allows reviewing and approving, just like git, but everyone knows how to use it, and functionals don't need to learn git nor that # this is a header and *this is italics* but **this is bold**.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Maxime Chambreuil - 03:25 - 20 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?


      El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 9:02, Stefano Consolaro (<stefano.consolaro@mymage.it>) escribió:
      Well, after a couple of days I think that there are some points to check:
      1 Who we are? How many functional people are active in OCA and have theme to analyze?

      No idea, but I guess just a few. OCA is hard even for devs.
       
      2 What can be a tool to support a functional discussion?

      A matrix community, with rooms. It can be good for devs too.
       
      3 What can be a tool to document a flow

       Google docs. It allows reviewing and approving, just like git, but everyone knows how to use it, and functionals don't need to learn git nor that # this is a header and *this is italics* but **this is bold**.
      by Jairo Llopis - 11:16 - 20 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Well, after a couple of days I think that there are some points to check:
      1 Who we are? How many functional people are active in OCA and have theme to analyze?
      2 What can be a tool to support a functional discussion?
      3 What can be a tool to document a flow

      So my proposal:

      1-2 We (OCA) can set up a Functional mailing list, we do a bit of promotion and in a couple of weeks/months we can have some information on how many we are and what is the interest on these channel.
      The mailing list for me is the best tool because there is a thread management, request a bit before replay, can be searced, can be viewed from who is out of the list.

      3 Readme inside each module must be well done, but a tool that collects/organizes all the informations and has a "simple" UI can help.
      In Odoo-Italia we begin to set-up a documentation tool using the Odoo original one with some little adjustment; you can give a sight here (obviously in Italian language) https://www.odoo-italia.org/documentazione/ .

      For example if you go to "Sviluppo" (develop), "Come fare una revisione" (How to do a review) https://www.odoo-italia.org/documentazione/12.0/sviluppo/review.html you will see the content with a navigation list on the left; when you clik on "Modifica su GitHub" (Edit on GitHub)
          - if you are a member of documentation group, you can edit the page and directly save it with a commit
          - if you aren't a member, you will be request to create a fork of the repository an then create a PR (Pull Request) to submit the changes.

      I know that some "pure functional" can dislike the need to subscribe to GitHub and use the procedure of fork-PR, but this can be a method to select/instruct the contributors and once proved the quality they can be enroled in the group; secondary Git management tools like GitHub have powerful features to simplify the proces.

      Back to initial page, on the bottom there is "Repository OCA" / " "Protezione dei dati" (OCA Repository / Data protection) https://www.odoo-italia.org/documentazione/12.0/repo_oca/data-protection/moduli/privacy.html .
      Here you will see the readme of the Data Protection - Privacy module (https://github.com/OCA/data-protection/tree/12.0/privacy) translate in italian.
      It is a simple operation of copy and paste of the module's readme.rst with little adjustment and the translation: apart from the content, it can be created a template for all the readme documents.


      Stefano Consolaro
      www.mymage.it
      by Stefano Consolaro - 10:01 - 20 Feb 2020

  • OCA members list on odoo-community.org
    Hello everybody,

    just a quick notice to tell you that we are aware of an issue w/ members listing.

    Some of them are not appearing even if their membership status should be correct.
    Some of them were fixed already, some need further investigation.

    Meanwhile, if you don't appear there, please make sure you've completed the survey for being published https://odoo-community.org/survey/start/oca-website-privacy-13.

    Side note: we are thinking about shuffling the ordering randomly from time to time in order to not have always the same people on top or bottom.

    We'll keep you posted.

    Bests,
    Simone
    OCA board
    by Simone Orsi. - 08:41 - 14 Feb 2020

    2 replies 2 replies

  • Proposing Lois Rilo as PSC for server-ux
    Hi all,

    I would like to help maintain pulls requests and issues at server-ux. I've contributed as author and core maintainer of base_tier_validation and there are several related PR still open that I would like to push forward. I also contributed to document_quick_access addons and would like to help on migration and reviews.

    I see the only team with rights in that repo is "Tools maintainers". I wouldn't need to be part of such wide group, but I also understand that segregating the PSC teams even more is not a good approach for maintainability reasons. Any of those two options would be good for me.

    Regards,

    --
    Lois Rilo Antelo - Odoo consultant at ForgeFlow
    twitter: @LoisRForgeFlow
    by Lois Rilo Antelo - 04:35 - 12 Feb 2020

    10 replies 10 replies

  • Help on Email Marketing 
    Hello community,

To be honest, the Email Marketing App is not something I have used before.
I was expecting it to be like an upgraded version of email templates, 
but AFAICS it uses a fixed QWeb template, and you can't add dynamic 
fields, like the Contact's name of job/function.

Am I missing something?
If not, has anyone worked on some module to allow rendering dynamic 
fields on the outgoing email, similarly to email templates?


Thank is advance for your insights
Daniel Reis
    by Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt> - 11:50 - 12 Feb 2020

    3 replies 3 replies

    • RE: Help on Email Marketing

      Daniel,

       

       

       

      De: manish@o2b.co.in [mailto:manish@o2b.co.in]
      Enviado el: miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2020 12:17
      Para: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Asunto: RE: Help on Email Marketing

       

      Please use like ${object.name} for name

       

      From: Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt>
      Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 4:22 PM
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: Help on Email Marketing

       

      Hello community,

       

      To be honest, the Email Marketing App is not something I have used before.
      I was expecting it to be like an upgraded version of email templates, 
      but AFAICS it uses a fixed QWeb template, and you can't add dynamic 
      fields, like the Contact's name of job/function.

       

      Am I missing something?
      If not, has anyone worked on some module to allow rendering dynamic 
      fields on the outgoing email, similarly to email templates?

       

       

      Thank is advance for your insights
      Daniel Reis
      by Rafael Blasco (Moduon) - 03:16 - 21 Feb 2020

      2 attachments 2 attachments

      image002.png
      image001.png
    • Re: Help on Email Marketing
      Hello Daniel,

      as far as i know, you could insert fields via website_builder..
      But my last looking after this app was a while ago..

      ___________________________________
      Maik Steinfeld

      Tel:     +49 (0) 3831 - 44557 - 00
      Mobil: +49 (0) 176 92 62 08 87
      E-Mail: m.steinfeld@intero-technologies.de

      Intero Technologies GmbH
      Heinrich-Heine-Ring 76
      D - 18435 Stralsund 
      Tel:    +49 (0) 3831 - 44 55 7 - 0
      Fax:   +49 (0) 3831 - 44 55 7 - 79 

      Internet: www.intero-technologies.de
      Facebook: facebook.com/interotechnologies

      Intero Technologies GmbH | Firmensitz: Stralsund, Heinrich-Heine-Ring 76, 18435 Stralsund , Deutschland | Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stralsund, HRB 7076 | Geschäftsführer: Frank Löffler, Lars Lifson | USt-Ident.Nr. DE 251251697

      This eMail and its content is dedicated to the intended recipient only. If you have received it in error please contact the sender immediately by fax or return eMail. Please then delete the eMail and any copies of it.

      Von: "Daniel Reis" <dgreis@sapo.pt>
      An: "Contributors" <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 11:52:04
      Betreff: Help on Email Marketing

      Hello community,

To be honest, the Email Marketing App is not something I have used before.
I was expecting it to be like an upgraded version of email templates, 
but AFAICS it uses a fixed QWeb template, and you can't add dynamic 
fields, like the Contact's name of job/function.

Am I missing something?
If not, has anyone worked on some module to allow rendering dynamic 
fields on the outgoing email, similarly to email templates?


Thank is advance for your insights
Daniel Reis

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe


      by Maik Steinfeld - 12:16 - 12 Feb 2020
    • RE: Help on Email Marketing

      Please use like ${object.name} for name

       

      From: Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt>
      Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 4:22 PM
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: Help on Email Marketing

       

      Hello community,
       
      To be honest, the Email Marketing App is not something I have used before.
      I was expecting it to be like an upgraded version of email templates, 
      but AFAICS it uses a fixed QWeb template, and you can't add dynamic 
      fields, like the Contact's name of job/function.
       
      Am I missing something?
      If not, has anyone worked on some module to allow rendering dynamic 
      fields on the outgoing email, similarly to email templates?
       
       
      Thank is advance for your insights
      Daniel Reis
      by Manish Mannan - 12:15 - 12 Feb 2020
  • Can Odoo create asset on Stock IN, instead on Invoice Post?
    Hi community,

    As we know, about Asset in Odoo. Normally, asset is created when Invoice is posted.

    AFIK, other ERP system will create asset on Stock In. Which make more sense to me. What is your opinion about this?

    Are there OCA modules that did that?

    Thank you!
    by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 07:36 - 12 Feb 2020

    4 replies 4 replies

    • Re: Can Odoo create asset on Stock IN, instead on Invoice Post?
      Hi,

      Ownership is in no way a legal issue for recognition of assets, plenty of businesses have assets on their balance sheet they do not own and conversely things that appear to be assets not on their balance sheet they do own.  

      Ownership, legal or otherwise, is merely a piece of evidence to demonstrate control of an asset under IFRS. The test is control and expected (meaning probable) future economic benefits. Add to that you must be able to reliably value it and that is essentially the criteria under IFRS.  The trick is in the last part, you need to be able to reliably value it and big assets are rarely initially valued at the sticker price.

      Leases and time limited quotas are a classic example of a depreciable asset without ownership. There are plenty of others. 

      And the obvious counterpoint to legality, when you receipt stock in you create an inventory asset don't you? In fact you create even though there commonly is a specific clause in your suppliers credit terms stating that title does not pass until the goods are paid for. So not only do you not own it, someone else is asserting ownership yet they no longer recognise it as an asset, but you do.

      On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:17 PM Ermin Trevisan <trevi@twanda.com> wrote:
      Hi Kitti

      IMHO this is a legal issue. According to my knowledge, activating (in the balance sheet) and deprecating an asset requires legal ownership. Receiving an asset only creates possession, but not necessarily ownership.

      Best, trevi

      On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 06:37 +0000, Kitti Upariphutthiphong wrote:
      Hi community,

      As we know, about Asset in Odoo. Normally, asset is created when Invoice is posted.

      AFIK, other ERP system will create asset on Stock In. Which make more sense to me. What is your opinion about this?

      Are there OCA modules that did that?

      Thank you!

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      --
      twanda AG
      Ermin Trevisan
      Artherstrasse 19
      CH-6318 Walchwil

      T: +41 41 758 1515
      M: +41 79 208 7373
      E: trevi@twanda.com
      www.twanda.ch

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Graeme Gellatly - 04:00 - 16 Feb 2020
    • Re: Can Odoo create asset on Stock IN, instead on Invoice Post?
      Hi Kitti

      IMHO this is a legal issue. According to my knowledge, activating (in the balance sheet) and deprecating an asset requires legal ownership. Receiving an asset only creates possession, but not necessarily ownership.

      Best, trevi

      On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 06:37 +0000, Kitti Upariphutthiphong wrote:
      Hi community,

      As we know, about Asset in Odoo. Normally, asset is created when Invoice is posted.

      AFIK, other ERP system will create asset on Stock In. Which make more sense to me. What is your opinion about this?

      Are there OCA modules that did that?

      Thank you!

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      --
      twanda AG
      Ermin Trevisan
      Artherstrasse 19
      CH-6318 Walchwil

      T: +41 41 758 1515
      M: +41 79 208 7373
      E: trevi@twanda.com
      www.twanda.ch
      by Ermin Trevisan - 09:15 - 13 Feb 2020
    • Re: Can Odoo create asset on Stock IN, instead on Invoice Post?
      Thank you Dominique,

      Thanks for the concise answer. Make sense to me ;)

      On Wed, Feb 12, 2020, 2:07 PM Dominique k <dominique.k@elico-corp.com.sg> wrote:
      my 2 cents:

      In general, I would say that odoo warehouse is for "Operations", such as trading, or logistic services. The warehouse module is not well suited for asset management, hence, creating a "financial asset" (meaning a depreciation board) from the incoming shipment does not seem a good idea:
      - if the business has genuine inventory, mixing asset with inventory items is a bit messy/chaotic
      - if the business does not use the inventory module (e.g. service company), then installing the warehouse module is an overkill

      Regards,


      On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:37, Kitti Upariphutthiphong <kittiu@ecosoft.co.th> wrote:
      Hi community,

      As we know, about Asset in Odoo. Normally, asset is created when Invoice is posted.

      AFIK, other ERP system will create asset on Stock In. Which make more sense to me. What is your opinion about this?

      Are there OCA modules that did that?

      Thank you!

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 01:51 - 12 Feb 2020
    • Re: Can Odoo create asset on Stock IN, instead on Invoice Post?
      my 2 cents:

      In general, I would say that odoo warehouse is for "Operations", such as trading, or logistic services. The warehouse module is not well suited for asset management, hence, creating a "financial asset" (meaning a depreciation board) from the incoming shipment does not seem a good idea:
      - if the business has genuine inventory, mixing asset with inventory items is a bit messy/chaotic
      - if the business does not use the inventory module (e.g. service company), then installing the warehouse module is an overkill

      Regards,


      On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:37, Kitti Upariphutthiphong <kittiu@ecosoft.co.th> wrote:
      Hi community,

      As we know, about Asset in Odoo. Normally, asset is created when Invoice is posted.

      AFIK, other ERP system will create asset on Stock In. Which make more sense to me. What is your opinion about this?

      Are there OCA modules that did that?

      Thank you!

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by dominique.k - 08:06 - 12 Feb 2020
  • l10n-italy on apps.odoo.com

    Hello,

    i'm looking for owner of the l10n-italy repository on apps.odoo.com because that repository is not updated,

    odoo helpdesk says the owner is openerp-community-reviewer@lists.launchpad.net but this email is very old and i've got no answer

    someone could help me?

    thanks

    --
    Andrea Cometa | Cybersecurity Manager
    Presidente Associazione Odoo Italia
    Responsabile Commerciale ed Amministrativo Apulia Software srl
    Taranto / Milano / Potenza
    Tel: 0999915404 http://www.apuliasoftware.it
    a.cometa@apuliasoftware.it pec: apulia.software@pec.it
    linkedin: http://it.linkedin.com/in/andreacometa
    by Andrea Cometa - 04:40 - 11 Feb 2020

    1 attachments 1 attachments

    signature.asc

    11 replies 11 replies

  • Activity: reminders 
    Dear community,

Is there a module that sends a notification (email or chat) about upcoming activity e.g. 5-3-1 days before the deadline? I’ve been looking into the Odoo sources and OCA repositories, yet it seems that there’s no such feature.

Kind regards,
Alexey
    by Alexey Pelykh <alexey.pelykh@gmail.com> - 06:01 - 8 Feb 2020

    15 replies 15 replies

  • How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
    Dear community,

    I have a pretty hard question :)

    We always say that functional people  is vital to ERP system, for sure in the project. But are functional people have places in OCA?

    Are there forum or any place where functional can fully contribute their business knowledge without friction of tech, github and programmer languages?

    Any pure functional people in OCA can help answer this? :)
    Thanks!

    Note: This question is passed here by my functional peer who want to participate in OCA. But I also don't have that good suggestion too.
    by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 08:46 - 5 Feb 2020

    37 replies 37 replies

    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      My 2cents attempt to answer your questions:

      • Why is it desired from OCA, that functional people take part? What would be the benefits? Why would OCA value that?
      I think that most people interested in odoo have to find answers to functional questions they have first.
      Greater adoption of odoo is in the interest of OCA.
      • What are the expectations of OCA?
      from our about page:
      "Establish and support an Open Source and collaborative community for the development and promotion of the Odoo features and modules."
      • Is there a structure that welcomes functional people and makes their contributions valued?
      Yes through raising GitHub issues but those discussions are still "owned" by technical people (PSC)
      • Could or should a structure be created that supports functionals or even takes them for granted or as a necessary part?
      I believe it might be useful to have functional discussions "owned" and moderated by functional people.
      For example, it could be nice to have somewhere user case discussed, proposed solution path and maybe some challenged proposed solutions.

      • Why do functional people wish to contribute? What are their expectations?

      • What prevents them? How can we find out? What happens / happened in the past to functional people who are /were interested in contributing to the community.
      There isn't a place to discuss how to do implement, find answers to use cases. Discuss the usefulness of new features.
      Raising a Github issue is usually handled by the PSC and centered around the coding challenges.
      • How can an integrating and welcoming culture be improved and how can that be measured?
      Maybe list "use cases" and their answer in the form of a detailed solution path. and the option to challenge those solution paths?!
      This could also cover the "user manual" as a starting discussion point per OCA offered module? that could be challenged, ideas of improvement, new functionalities.
      Maybe a forum could be a useful tool. with answers voted as "best answer". The number of people participating would be a good measure of interest in the topic at hand.

      Here's a concrete example:
       Q. user a needs to offer the prospect a website with a simulator and at his request, initiate a CRM pipeline process using the data used in the simulator.

      A1: code a module with a form (controller + javascript).
      A2: use and extend the "survey" module.
      A3: integrate an existing javascript library.

      Which one is better? what are +- for each solution?
      Maybe a discussion about this will interest users with the same kind of needs. Maybe technical people will want to bring their idea about the topic
      I think that discussion could take place off Github. (in a forum?!).

      Anyway, hope this makes sense and is useful to someone here.
      Good weekend everyone.


      --
      Yves Goldberg
      --


      ----- Original message -----
      From: "Bettina Pfeifer dygytally.de" <bettina@dygytally.de>
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Date: Saturday, February 15, 2020 19:57

      Dear Kitti, dear community,

      as a functional person I would like to add my 2ct in the discussion about this "pretty hard question :) " from Kitti.

      First of all, this question really really needs to be discussed together with functional people. Some of you already pointed that out.

      If tech people suggest what to change, this is a nice move, but keeps generating solutions from tech people.

      Odoo has a (open or not so open) culture of "everything is in the sourcecode" and this is a rather difficult approach for functionals.

      In my opinion it is most of all a question of culture, so we could first of all ask more detailed questions like these: 

      • Why is it desired from OCA, that functional people take part? What would be the benefits? Why would OCA value that?
      • What are the expectations from OCA?
      • Is there a structure that welcomes functional people and makes their contributions valued?
      • Could or should a structure be created that supports functionals or even takes them for granted or as a necessary part?
      • Why do functional people wish to contribute? What are their expectations?
      • What prevents them? How can we find out? What happens / happened in the past to functional people who are /were interested in contributing to the community.
      • How can an integrating and welcoming culture be improved and how can that be measured?

      These questions can not be answered with tools. In my opinion, there needs to be an actively managed process to change more than tools.

      Disclaimer: I am not a pure functional, I am also an experienced developer (outside of the python world) with solid database know how. Moving into a functional role as an Odoo Partner I hoped to escape the developer and tech world. Today, I do develop modules sometimes, use Github and look into the source code. (And have programmers to do more developments. ) Probably a lot of contributors are in a half tech and half functional role themselves. So it should not be too difficult to understand the pure functional world.

      The fog in the forest picture from Landis made me smile and now, finally, I send this mail, which I had in my Draft folder for a while.

      Kind regards, Bettina

      --

      Am 05.02.20 um 20:46 schrieb Kitti Upariphutthiphong:

      Dear community,

      I have a pretty hard question :)

      We always say that functional people  is vital to ERP system, for sure in the project. But are functional people have places in OCA?

      Are there forum or any place where functional can fully contribute their business knowledge without friction of tech, github and programmer languages?

      Any pure functional people in OCA can help answer this? :)
      Thanks!

      Note: This question is passed here by my functional peer who want to participate in OCA. But I also don't have that good suggestion too.

      _______________________________________________
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org


      by Yves Goldberg - 07:56 - 15 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

      Dear Kitti, dear community,

      as a functional person I would like to add my 2ct in the discussion about this "pretty hard question :) " from Kitti.

      First of all, this question really really needs to be discussed together with functional people. Some of you already pointed that out.

      If tech people suggest what to change, this is a nice move, but keeps generating solutions from tech people.

      Odoo has a (open or not so open) culture of "everything is in the sourcecode" and this is a rather difficult approach for functionals.

      In my opinion it is most of all a question of culture, so we could first of all ask more detailed questions like these: 

      • Why is it desired from OCA, that functional people take part? What would be the benefits? Why would OCA value that?
      • What are the expectations from OCA?
      • Is there a structure that welcomes functional people and makes their contributions valued?
      • Could or should a structure be created that supports functionals or even takes them for granted or as a necessary part?
      • Why do functional people wish to contribute? What are their expectations?
      • What prevents them? How can we find out? What happens / happened in the past to functional people who are /were interested in contributing to the community.
      • How can an integrating and welcoming culture be improved and how can that be measured?

      These questions can not be answered with tools. In my opinion, there needs to be an actively managed process to change more than tools.

      Disclaimer: I am not a pure functional, I am also an experienced developer (outside of the python world) with solid database know how. Moving into a functional role as an Odoo Partner I hoped to escape the developer and tech world. Today, I do develop modules sometimes, use Github and look into the source code. (And have programmers to do more developments. ) Probably a lot of contributors are in a half tech and half functional role themselves. So it should not be too difficult to understand the pure functional world.

      The fog in the forest picture from Landis made me smile and now, finally, I send this mail, which I had in my Draft folder for a while.

      Kind regards, Bettina

      --

      Am 05.02.20 um 20:46 schrieb Kitti Upariphutthiphong:

      Dear community,

      I have a pretty hard question :)

      We always say that functional people  is vital to ERP system, for sure in the project. But are functional people have places in OCA?

      Are there forum or any place where functional can fully contribute their business knowledge without friction of tech, github and programmer languages?

      Any pure functional people in OCA can help answer this? :)
      Thanks!

      Note: This question is passed here by my functional peer who want to participate in OCA. But I also don't have that good suggestion too.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Bettina Pfeifer. - 06:56 - 15 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Hello,


      I am pure blood functional, who cannot even query database. 

      Thank you all to talk about this topic and share many ideas/suggestions. This is a good example of opening space to talk and share but email or mailing list flows and gone, not suits as knowledge and content management.

      IMHO, functional consists of End Users and Implementor.

      If we talk about an End user, we should have place to chat and ask + knowledge or Content management because they want to decide to use our app or not. If so, how to use it > This should be Easy to access and find information > User documents, user manual.

      If we talk about functional Implementor, they should work as a team with technical. I think this group doesn't need Easy tool but it should be simple tool and simple way to work together. Functional spec or Requirements Spec is out of date for agile methodology, no longer writing this for technical. We need to discuss and share different aspects and ideas from Technical and functional then summarise, code and Test absolutely.

      > No doubt for runbot for testing but discussion, I would say

      > Wiki is easy but not in line with github which is powerful for technical and have to manage?

      > +1 github issue and link to google doc/sheet.

      Personally, github itself look scary for non-technical but not too difficult to use. Functional who really want to be in, they got strong passion to learn 'new world of techies'. They open thier mind to give and take. On the other hands, github will filter out Newbies because its structure. We have to accept that github born for technical. (Of I am not wrong)

      +1 Forum no reason, just experience it.

      ... TOTB...

      1. Let's try to change this thread topic to be Does OCA "really" need implementor functional and user?

       - If the answer is no, it's crystal clear. No need any action.
       - If your answer is yes, I believe you will find the way to let them it and be a part of team.

      2. Opensource is an area of technical or hybrid functional while Proprietary is an area of Functional, is this true?

      Last but not least, shall technical open mind to learn a new world of Functional?

      Thanks all.

      Regards,

      Wipawii

      www.ecosoft.co.th

      Your ERP Partner

      On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, 06:12 Bill Ennals, <bill@billennals.net> wrote:
      Hi Community,

      I’m also ‘mostly' functional.  I have no formal IT qualification or education but have self-taught the basics of administering a Ubuntu server and an Odoo CE installation for a small not-for-profit business (reversegarbageqld.com.au) in Australia.  I can’t really code, but I’m a stubborn googler and can do some low-level tinkering and can sometimes get to where I’m aiming for, sometimes not.

      It’s taken many years and we’re still only 50% implemented - no POS, public facing website, ecommerce and accounting yet, though all of that should be ready in the next six months.  Started on V7, open upgraded to v8, then leap frogged to V11 via a gruelling export/import process.  It’s been a crazy and unsustainable way to do it in many respects, but our hope is that the efficiency gains of using an integrated ERP will help to generate enough operational profit to be able to engage a professional local implementer, the costs of which (up until now at least) have been prohibitive.

      I agree with Landis about the welcoming landing place, and through all of this, the thing that I have most missed is a healthy discussion forum.  Having to piece together clues from the Odoo help forum (which is mostly awful), Stack Overflow, this mailing list and the patchy official documentation has absorbed hundreds of hours of my time, often for no return.  Sure, a comprehensive wiki would be awesome, but that would seem to require a gargantuan effort to make it any more useful than pointers to the current Github repositories.  Github is a little daunting and opaque for non-IT professionals, but it’s not terrible and a healthy community forum with a few good stickies about how to approach navigating the various parts of the Odoo universe for newbies would make it far less daunting.  If the standard of the ‘readme’s was improved, I think a separate wiki might be unnecessary duplication.

      Lastly (sorry for the long email), one comparable experience I’ve had lately is mucking about with custom roms on mobile devices, which I know nothing about apart from what I’ve learned from xda-developers.com.  Although it’s far from perfect, if I spend an hour there researching a particular topic or problem I’m having, I can feel pretty confident about whether it’s something that is worth pursuing, or if it’s just going to be a waste of my time, and therefore something I should drop altogther.  A combination of the stickies and guides for newbies, and the vibrant participation of the community there enables that.  I rarely feel that way after an hour of trying to figure out if a particular thing is possible in Odoo - more often I’m left with a bunch of unresolved questions.  Obviously the xda forums member base is huge, but if the Odoo claim about 4 million users is true, then a proper discussion forum should have something to work with - no?

      Bill.








      On 14 Feb 2020, at 12:21 AM, Landis Arnold <larnold@nomadic.net> wrote:

      Well, Being mostly "functional" I would say, first off, there needs to be a place to go and get information, ask questions, profer advise.  Documentation is important, even in Wiki form, but most important is a true and welvoming landing pad and place.  Branches should go out from there to subjects of the different repositories.

      As an example.  Information and sharing about upgrade paths and methods.  Fundamental changes, for users and system implementers about requirement changes generation to generation...  Is it possible to skip versions in upgrade sequencing.  say v 8, v10, v12, v14?  If so how?

      "Open" needs to be open and not obscure.  Installations and upgrades can be methodical and complex, but they must also be understandable. 

      Customization, which is essence, is what OCA is about, should be welcome, and also seen to be something that users can also do without creating a whole repository and running through a week of testing and approvals.  Interface changes, as an example, like moving an "add task" button to a project, or rearranging a menu interface etc.

      And on bigger customizations, how to have "funcionals" express a desire for a more efficient work flow.  A "wish list" is different than a "issue" until it becomes one.

      Anyway, it is an important subject, how to integrate "functionals" which really everyone is on some level.

      Landis Arnold
      Nomadic Inc
      Colorado USA


      Sent from Nine
      From: "Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa)" <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:47 AM
      To: Contributors
      Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?


      Jean-Charles, here there's no such OCA strategy of not wanting functional people, just as Lois says: there's no more physical time to perform what you want to do to attract more people. I still think laziness is a point, because some functional people have already contributed and be part of the community with a low barrier, but it's very easy to say "I'm not able to contribute because things are not easy". Think that we are all employees of a company that pays our time and have a lot of duties, and some of us have invested spare free time for trying to raise OCA, but this time is limited. So any of you can apply for being in the OCA board next year and conduct this, or simply arise at contributor for that specific task this year. My colleagues at board will love some help on this (I'm not anymore there due to the time restrictions I have and after being there during 3 years).

      Regards.
      <span id="cid:D10EFA06-18B5-49B7-9C55-57158B7F1E0A@home.gateway"><attachment>

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Wipawii Jaraswarapan - 03:55 - 14 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
      Hi Community,

      I’m also ‘mostly' functional.  I have no formal IT qualification or education but have self-taught the basics of administering a Ubuntu server and an Odoo CE installation for a small not-for-profit business (reversegarbageqld.com.au) in Australia.  I can’t really code, but I’m a stubborn googler and can do some low-level tinkering and can sometimes get to where I’m aiming for, sometimes not.

      It’s taken many years and we’re still only 50% implemented - no POS, public facing website, ecommerce and accounting yet, though all of that should be ready in the next six months.  Started on V7, open upgraded to v8, then leap frogged to V11 via a gruelling export/import process.  It’s been a crazy and unsustainable way to do it in many respects, but our hope is that the efficiency gains of using an integrated ERP will help to generate enough operational profit to be able to engage a professional local implementer, the costs of which (up until now at least) have been prohibitive.

      I agree with Landis about the welcoming landing place, and through all of this, the thing that I have most missed is a healthy discussion forum.  Having to piece together clues from the Odoo help forum (which is mostly awful), Stack Overflow, this mailing list and the patchy official documentation has absorbed hundreds of hours of my time, often for no return.  Sure, a comprehensive wiki would be awesome, but that would seem to require a gargantuan effort to make it any more useful than pointers to the current Github repositories.  Github is a little daunting and opaque for non-IT professionals, but it’s not terrible and a healthy community forum with a few good stickies about how to approach navigating the various parts of the Odoo universe for newbies would make it far less daunting.  If the standard of the ‘readme’s was improved, I think a separate wiki might be unnecessary duplication.

      Lastly (sorry for the long email), one comparable experience I’ve had lately is mucking about with custom roms on mobile devices, which I know nothing about apart from what I’ve learned from xda-developers.com.  Although it’s far from perfect, if I spend an hour there researching a particular topic or problem I’m having, I can feel pretty confident about whether it’s something that is worth pursuing, or if it’s just going to be a waste of my time, and therefore something I should drop altogther.  A combination of the stickies and guides for newbies, and the vibrant participation of the community there enables that.  I rarely feel that way after an hour of trying to figure out if a particular thing is possible in Odoo - more often I’m left with a bunch of unresolved questions.  Obviously the xda forums member base is huge, but if the Odoo claim about 4 million users is true, then a proper discussion forum should have something to work with - no?

      Bill.








      On 14 Feb 2020, at 12:21 AM, Landis Arnold <larnold@nomadic.net> wrote:

      Well, Being mostly "functional" I would say, first off, there needs to be a place to go and get information, ask questions, profer advise.  Documentation is important, even in Wiki form, but most important is a true and welvoming landing pad and place.  Branches should go out from there to subjects of the different repositories.

      As an example.  Information and sharing about upgrade paths and methods.  Fundamental changes, for users and system implementers about requirement changes generation to generation...  Is it possible to skip versions in upgrade sequencing.  say v 8, v10, v12, v14?  If so how?

      "Open" needs to be open and not obscure.  Installations and upgrades can be methodical and complex, but they must also be understandable. 

      Customization, which is essence, is what OCA is about, should be welcome, and also seen to be something that users can also do without creating a whole repository and running through a week of testing and approvals.  Interface changes, as an example, like moving an "add task" button to a project, or rearranging a menu interface etc.

      And on bigger customizations, how to have "funcionals" express a desire for a more efficient work flow.  A "wish list" is different than a "issue" until it becomes one.

      Anyway, it is an important subject, how to integrate "functionals" which really everyone is on some level.

      Landis Arnold
      Nomadic Inc
      Colorado USA


      Sent from Nine
      From: "Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa)" <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:47 AM
      To: Contributors
      Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?


      Jean-Charles, here there's no such OCA strategy of not wanting functional people, just as Lois says: there's no more physical time to perform what you want to do to attract more people. I still think laziness is a point, because some functional people have already contributed and be part of the community with a low barrier, but it's very easy to say "I'm not able to contribute because things are not easy". Think that we are all employees of a company that pays our time and have a lot of duties, and some of us have invested spare free time for trying to raise OCA, but this time is limited. So any of you can apply for being in the OCA board next year and conduct this, or simply arise at contributor for that specific task this year. My colleagues at board will love some help on this (I'm not anymore there due to the time restrictions I have and after being there during 3 years).

      Regards.
      <span id="cid:D10EFA06-18B5-49B7-9C55-57158B7F1E0A@home.gateway"><attachment>

      by bill - 12:11 - 14 Feb 2020
    • Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

      Well, Being mostly "functional" I would say, first off, there needs to be a place to go and get information, ask questions, profer advise.  Documentation is important, even in Wiki form, but most important is a true and welvoming landing pad and place.  Branches should go out from there to subjects of the different repositories.


      As an example.  Information and sharing about upgrade paths and methods.  Fundamental changes, for users and system implementers about requirement changes generation to generation...  Is it possible to skip versions in upgrade sequencing.  say v 8, v10, v12, v14?  If so how?


      "Open" needs to be open and not obscure.  Installations and upgrades can be methodical and complex, but they must also be understandable. 


      Customization, which is essence, is what OCA is about, should be welcome, and also seen to be something that users can also do without creating a whole repository and running through a week of testing and approvals.  Interface changes, as an example, like moving an "add task" button to a project, or rearranging a menu interface etc.


      And on bigger customizations, how to have "funcionals" express a desire for a more efficient work flow.  A "wish list" is different than a "issue" until it becomes one.


      Anyway, it is an important subject, how to integrate "functionals" which really everyone is on some level.


      Landis Arnold

      Nomadic Inc

      Colorado USA



      Sent from Nine
      From: "Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa)" <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com>
      Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:47 AM
      To: Contributors
      Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?


      Jean-Charles, here there's no such OCA strategy of not wanting functional people, just as Lois says: there's no more physical time to perform what you want to do to attract more people. I still think laziness is a point, because some functional people have already contributed and be part of the community with a low barrier, but it's very easy to say "I'm not able to contribute because things are not easy". Think that we are all employees of a company that pays our time and have a lot of duties, and some of us have invested spare free time for trying to raise OCA, but this time is limited. So any of you can apply for being in the OCA board next year and conduct this, or simply arise at contributor for that specific task this year. My colleagues at board will love some help on this (I'm not anymore there due to the time restrictions I have and after being there during 3 years).

      Regards.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by Landis Arnold - 03:21 - 13 Feb 2020

      1 attachments 1 attachments

      attachment

  • Pandoc Odoo Tables
    Hi All,

    For those working with pandoc markdown as their preferred publishing pipeline,
    I made a little integration to fetch tables from an odoo instance.

    BR, David A.
    by dar - 08:46 - 5 Feb 2020
  • Website sale : products restriction based on logged user
    Hello Community,

    I need some help for a specific Use Case. I hope this mailing list can be used for this type of question (if not, excuse me and tell me which way of asking would be best).

    Here is the context : there are a lot of products sold on the Website through eCommerce. All the non-logged in customers can choose in the whole list.
    For certain customers who have a login in Odoo, the list of the products available should be restricted.

    To make it clear:
    - Products A, B, C, D are on the website.
    - Customer of Category 1 (no login required for them) can buy A, B, C, D without restriction.
    - Customer of Category 2 (they should be logged in) can only by B and C.

    Another Use Case in the same idea of making some products appear/disappear on the eCommerce (from Sylvain Le Gal) : is there a way to make Products appear on the website based on a frequency (concept of date_range somewhere). Example :
    - Product A and B on Week 1
    - Product C and D on Week 2
    - Product A and B on Week 3
    - Product C and D on Week 4
    - etc.

    Have you seen any module making the job for one of these Use Cases?
    Thanks a lot!
    --
    Virginie
    0477/64.17.20
    --
    Si vous avez un contrat de support, posez-nous vos question à l'adresse "support@coopiteasy.be"
    --
    Lors de l'envoi d'un mail, renseignez le nom de la structure pour laquelle vous travaillez. Merci.
    by Virginie Dewulf. - 05:50 - 5 Feb 2020

    1 replies 1 replies

    • 回复：Website sale : products restriction based on logged user
      Hi Virginie. 

      You may can try the price list module. 

      Regards... DC
      DIT



      -------- 原始邮件 --------
      发件人： Virginie Dewulf <virginie@coopiteasy.be>
      日期： 2020年2月6日周四 凌晨3:51
      收件人： Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      主 题： Website sale : products restriction based on logged user
      Hello Community,

      I need some help for a specific Use Case. I hope this mailing list can be used for this type of question (if not, excuse me and tell me which way of asking would be best).

      Here is the context : there are a lot of products sold on the Website through eCommerce. All the non-logged in customers can choose in the whole list.
      For certain customers who have a login in Odoo, the list of the products available should be restricted.

      To make it clear:
      - Products A, B, C, D are on the website.
      - Customer of Category 1 (no login required for them) can buy A, B, C, D without restriction.
      - Customer of Category 2 (they should be logged in) can only by B and C.

      Another Use Case in the same idea of making some products appear/disappear on the eCommerce (from Sylvain Le Gal) : is there a way to make Products appear on the website based on a frequency (concept of date_range somewhere). Example :
      - Product A and B on Week 1
      - Product C and D on Week 2
      - Product A and B on Week 3
      - Product C and D on Week 4
      - etc.

      Have you seen any module making the job for one of these Use Cases?
      Thanks a lot!
      --
      Virginie
      0477/64.17.20
      --
      Si vous avez un contrat de support, posez-nous vos question à l'adresse "support@coopiteasy.be"
      --
      Lors de l'envoi d'un mail, renseignez le nom de la structure pour laquelle vous travaillez. Merci.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by DIT INTL - 06:40 - 6 Feb 2020
  • Proposing Sergio Zanchetta for Italy PSC
    Hi all,

    I would like to propose Sergio Zanchetta
    for Italian PSC so that he can help us managing issues and pull requests.

    Thanks

    --
    Lorenzo Battistini
    https://github.com/eLBati

    by Lorenzo Battistini. - 12:30 - 5 Feb 2020

    10 replies 10 replies

  • "Project Use Case" or "Customer References"
    Hi community,

    I remember seeing and testing a module to publish "success stories" from projects in previous Odoo versions. But my memory and our knowledge base is empty on this subject for most recently versions...

    We want to share with clients and partners our experiences and projects. The name of the customer is not systematically published (NDA), but the history of the project, its scope, the tools and technicals, the team involved, screenshots, maybe video ...

    I think the main model is project.
    We had until Odoo v10 the addon website_project

    We found this addon https://github.com/baba75/website_case_history where we can input several informations, for example this screenshot

    image.png

    This addon depends on website, not project at all.

    Before we plan the development of a new module or offer a contribution to this one, do you know modules with similar features?

    Bruno Joliveau - Architecte applications - Président
    NUMIGI SOLUTIONS INC.
    (514) 317-7944

    Longueuil, Québec, Canada

    linkedinyoutubecustom-icontwitter
    by Bruno Joliveau - 12:25 - 4 Feb 2020

    1 attachments 1 attachments

    image.png
  • stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
    Hello Contributors,

    We are using Odoo 11 for a retail chain. They have over 60 POS locations (and increasing across the country) and over 17000 products (also increasing).

    Recently, for past two months, we are facing strange problem. The retail chain do purchase order once in a month to the vendor and the PO contains over hundreds of products. They are using lot based tracking. When we are receiving products with lot number it takes forever to validate. Even some pickings are stuck and can't be validated. We tried all the possible workarounds but still no luck. There are no errors too.

    The instance is running on AWS with RDS. RDS configuration:
    PostgreSQL - 10.10
    4 vcpu x 16 GB RAM
    100 GB SSD
    IOPS: 100 * 3 = 300

    How can we validate the stock.pickings? Any idea or thoughts appreciated.

    Best Regards,
    MD. Tanzilul Hasan Khan
    by ponkhi403 - 08:00 - 3 Feb 2020

    7 replies 7 replies

    • RE: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating

      MD

       

      My apologies I spoke too soon. Just had a look at what we do and all we do is

      • On button submit, instead of processing on the users screen we submit a background task that runs every minute and then effectively runs the submit logic

      • We split out invoice create ( we have a module which creates the draft supplier invoice) as a separate task.

       

       

      We have found that when you add lots or serial numbers (which means stock.move.line records) things slow down considerably.

       

      It would be possible to extend our module to handle each stock move line as a separate commit – looking at our largest customer the longest background task has taken 5 minutes

       

      Regards Kevin

       

      From: MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:48 PM
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: Re: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating

       

      Did you create automated action for move lines?

       

      As we are using track by lots (can be unique or use existing), how are you managing the lot creation or update? Won’t it create 400 backorders if you are validating one by one ?

       

      Thanks




      On Feb 13, 2020 at 1:51 AM, <Kevin McMenamin> wrote:

      We have had similar – we have a client receiving ~400 lines on a PO. There are issues around average cost calculation. Our solution was to make the receipting a background process and receipt line by line – that way if anything happens to a product during the receipt cycle you don’t get a full roll back.

       

      Contact me below if you would like to discuss further.

       

       

      Regards

       

       

      Kevin McMenamin

      ERP Capability Manager, Solnet

       +64 22 651 3753 | +64 9 977 5805 | Visit our blog | Connect on LinkedIn

       

       

       

       

       

       

      From: MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      Sent: Monday, 3 February 2020 8:02 PM
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating

       

      Hello Contributors,

       

      We are using Odoo 11 for a retail chain. They have over 60 POS locations (and increasing across the country) and over 17000 products (also increasing).

       

      Recently, for past two months, we are facing strange problem. The retail chain do purchase order once in a month to the vendor and the PO contains over hundreds of products. They are using lot based tracking. When we are receiving products with lot number it takes forever to validate. Even some pickings are stuck and can't be validated. We tried all the possible workarounds but still no luck. There are no errors too.

       

      The instance is running on AWS with RDS. RDS configuration:
      PostgreSQL - 10.10
      4 vcpu x 16 GB RAM
      100 GB SSD
      IOPS: 100 * 3 = 300

       

      How can we validate the stock.pickings? Any idea or thoughts appreciated.

       

      Best Regards,

      MD. Tanzilul Hasan Khan

      Attention: This email may contain information intended for the sole use of the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you believe you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender or postmaster@solnetsolutions.co.nz as soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd.

      Attention: This email may contain information intended for the sole use of the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you believe you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender or postmaster@solnetsolutions.co.nz as soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd.
      by Kevin McMenamin - 11:21 - 13 Feb 2020
    • Re: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      Did you create automated action for move lines?

      As we are using track by lots (can be unique or use existing), how are you managing the lot creation or update? Won’t it create 400 backorders if you are validating one by one ?

      Thanks


      On Feb 13, 2020 at 1:51 AM, <Kevin McMenamin> wrote:

      We have had similar – we have a client receiving ~400 lines on a PO. There are issues around average cost calculation. Our solution was to make the receipting a background process and receipt line by line – that way if anything happens to a product during the receipt cycle you don’t get a full roll back.

       

      Contact me below if you would like to discuss further.

       

       

      Regards

       

       

      Kevin McMenamin

      ERP Capability Manager, Solnet

       +64 22 651 3753 | +64 9 977 5805 | Visit our blog | Connect on LinkedIn

       

       

       

       

       

       

      From: MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      Sent: Monday, 3 February 2020 8:02 PM
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating

       

      Hello Contributors,

       

      We are using Odoo 11 for a retail chain. They have over 60 POS locations (and increasing across the country) and over 17000 products (also increasing).

       

      Recently, for past two months, we are facing strange problem. The retail chain do purchase order once in a month to the vendor and the PO contains over hundreds of products. They are using lot based tracking. When we are receiving products with lot number it takes forever to validate. Even some pickings are stuck and can't be validated. We tried all the possible workarounds but still no luck. There are no errors too.

       

      The instance is running on AWS with RDS. RDS configuration:
      PostgreSQL - 10.10
      4 vcpu x 16 GB RAM
      100 GB SSD
      IOPS: 100 * 3 = 300

       

      How can we validate the stock.pickings? Any idea or thoughts appreciated.

       

      Best Regards,

      MD. Tanzilul Hasan Khan

      Attention: This email may contain information intended for the sole use of the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you believe you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender or postmaster@solnetsolutions.co.nz as soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd.

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by ponkhi403 - 05:46 - 13 Feb 2020
    • RE: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating

      We have had similar – we have a client receiving ~400 lines on a PO. There are issues around average cost calculation. Our solution was to make the receipting a background process and receipt line by line – that way if anything happens to a product during the receipt cycle you don’t get a full roll back.

       

      Contact me below if you would like to discuss further.

       

       

      Regards

       

       

      Kevin McMenamin

      ERP Capability Manager, Solnet

       +64 22 651 3753 | +64 9 977 5805 | Visit our blog | Connect on LinkedIn

       

       

       

       

       

       

      From: MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      Sent: Monday, 3 February 2020 8:02 PM
      To: Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      Subject: stock.picking very slow and some are not validating

       

      Hello Contributors,

       

      We are using Odoo 11 for a retail chain. They have over 60 POS locations (and increasing across the country) and over 17000 products (also increasing).

       

      Recently, for past two months, we are facing strange problem. The retail chain do purchase order once in a month to the vendor and the PO contains over hundreds of products. They are using lot based tracking. When we are receiving products with lot number it takes forever to validate. Even some pickings are stuck and can't be validated. We tried all the possible workarounds but still no luck. There are no errors too.

       

      The instance is running on AWS with RDS. RDS configuration:
      PostgreSQL - 10.10
      4 vcpu x 16 GB RAM
      100 GB SSD
      IOPS: 100 * 3 = 300

       

      How can we validate the stock.pickings? Any idea or thoughts appreciated.

       

      Best Regards,

      MD. Tanzilul Hasan Khan

      Attention: This email may contain information intended for the sole use of the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you believe you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender or postmaster@solnetsolutions.co.nz as soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd.
      by Kevin McMenamin - 08:51 - 12 Feb 2020
    • 回复：回复：stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      The error didn't appear in single warehouse system as our observation. 



      -------- 原始邮件 --------
      发件人： MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      日期： 2020年2月3日周一 晚上7:12
      收件人： Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      主 题： Re: 回复：stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      Yes, we are using multi warehouse and multi location options.  

      Thanks


      On Feb 3, 2020 at 1:32 PM, <‪‪DIT International‬‬> wrote:

      Is multi-warehouse your customer using?
      DC 
      Regards



      -------- 原始邮件 --------
      发件人： MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      日期： 2020年2月3日周一 傍晚6:01
      收件人： Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      主 题： stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      Hello Contributors,

      We are using Odoo 11 for a retail chain. They have over 60 POS locations (and increasing across the country) and over 17000 products (also increasing).

      Recently, for past two months, we are facing strange problem. The retail chain do purchase order once in a month to the vendor and the PO contains over hundreds of products. They are using lot based tracking. When we are receiving products with lot number it takes forever to validate. Even some pickings are stuck and can't be validated. We tried all the possible workarounds but still no luck. There are no errors too.

      The instance is running on AWS with RDS. RDS configuration:
      PostgreSQL - 10.10
      4 vcpu x 16 GB RAM
      100 GB SSD
      IOPS: 100 * 3 = 300

      How can we validate the stock.pickings? Any idea or thoughts appreciated.

      Best Regards,
      MD. Tanzilul Hasan Khan

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by DIT INTL - 11:50 - 3 Feb 2020
    • 回复：回复：stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      We got one similar case before. and we upgraded the Inventory module to fix it. 


      -------- 原始邮件 --------
      发件人： MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      日期： 2020年2月3日周一 晚上7:12
      收件人： Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      主 题： Re: 回复：stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      Yes, we are using multi warehouse and multi location options.  

      Thanks


      On Feb 3, 2020 at 1:32 PM, <‪‪DIT International‬‬> wrote:

      Is multi-warehouse your customer using?
      DC 
      Regards



      -------- 原始邮件 --------
      发件人： MD Tanzilul Hasan Khan <ponkhi403@gmail.com>
      日期： 2020年2月3日周一 傍晚6:01
      收件人： Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
      主 题： stock.picking very slow and some are not validating
      Hello Contributors,

      We are using Odoo 11 for a retail chain. They have over 60 POS locations (and increasing across the country) and over 17000 products (also increasing).

      Recently, for past two months, we are facing strange problem. The retail chain do purchase order once in a month to the vendor and the PO contains over hundreds of products. They are using lot based tracking. When we are receiving products with lot number it takes forever to validate. Even some pickings are stuck and can't be validated. We tried all the possible workarounds but still no luck. There are no errors too.

      The instance is running on AWS with RDS. RDS configuration:
      PostgreSQL - 10.10
      4 vcpu x 16 GB RAM
      100 GB SSD
      IOPS: 100 * 3 = 300

      How can we validate the stock.pickings? Any idea or thoughts appreciated.

      Best Regards,
      MD. Tanzilul Hasan Khan

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      _______________________________________________
      Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
      Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
      Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

      by DIT INTL - 11:50 - 3 Feb 2020