Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Code Headers - Copyright Assertions
by
LasLabs, Dave Lasley
Copyright is explicitly defined and noted as a right retained by the contributing entity as part of the OCA CLA.
Thank you,
<img height="49" width="50" apple-inline="yes" id="BC571E4F-90A7-4D86-8E45-95879A5BFE6C" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:B6781F39-FEE7-4B4E-91AD-FDB83E4A18E3@dlasley.net" class="">
I’m all for attribution, but I think we are mixing a legal and an open source concept. Could we instead readd the @author tag, or something similar?
Thank you,
Dave Lasley - LasLabs
Founder / CEO
<img height="49" width="50" apple-inline="yes" id="BC571E4F-90A7-4D86-8E45-95879A5BFE6C" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:B6781F39-FEE7-4B4E-91AD-FDB83E4A18E3@dlasley.net" class="">
On Aug 17, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa) <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com> wrote:These questions depend a lot on the copyright laws of each country, but the copyright itself is too tied to private world instead of open source, because the copyright means rights over the exploitation of that work.In this case, we prefer to consider the copyright as an attribution line, giving the developers the credits for their work.Regards.2016-08-17 17:53 GMT+02:00 Dave Lasley <dave@laslabs.com>:Hi All,
A conversation just started up in a pull request regarding the copyright assertions in our code headers, and I figured it would be better to maybe break it out into its own forum instead.The conversation is on Github here if you would like to read it - https://github.com/OCA/website/pull/202/files/ 0dd4e1cce88c7d96850b8b295ab56d 15f7812f03#r75140154 The high level issue at hand here is whether we should be adding individuals to the copyright, if that copyright is being asserted by a company.The arguments for adding authors as well as companies:
- This allows for attribution to the author on a per-file basis
- This allows for individual to be contacted regarding specifics of work that was submitted
The arguments against:
- This creates ambiguity of the copyright, asserting that both the Company and Individual hold copyright to the code
- This adds undue burden on maintainers in instances where the assertion needs to be updated, such as in my block reasoning
I would love to see some more thoughts on this.
Thank you,Dave Lasley - LasLabsFounder / CEO
<img height="49" width="50" apple-inline="yes" id="AF77043B-CCF1-4332-9D75-946DD83ABFB5" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:B6781F39-FEE7-4B4E- 91AD-FDB83E4A18E3@dlasley.net" class=""> ______________________________
_________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe _______________________________________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
Reference
-
Code Headers - Copyright Assertions
byLasLabs, Dave Lasley-
Re: Code Headers - Copyright Assertions
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis -
Re: Code Headers - Copyright Assertions
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza -
Re: Code Headers - Copyright Assertions
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza