1. Mailing Lists
  2. Contributors
  3. Re: Proposal for new workflow, incorporating "Optimistic Merging"

Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Browse archives

Re: Proposal for new workflow, incorporating "Optimistic Merging"

Re: Proposal for new workflow, incorporating "Optimistic Merging"

Avatar

Re: Proposal for new workflow, incorporating "Optimistic Merging"

by
redCOR AG, Robert Rottermann
- 07/06/2016 22:25:19 
sounds good.

but set up a set of rules that every commit/commiter has to adhere to.

On 07/06/2016 20:38, Daniel Reis wrote:
>
> Thank you all for the feedback so far.
> I can see that people really have divided opinions on this.
> (OTOH It would be boring if we all agreed on everything :-)
>
>
> So, I would like reword my goal for my proposal, stepping back a little:
>
>
> The goal would be for a few volunteers to drive an *experiment* with 
> optimistic merging, in a couple of selected repos.
> It should keep having stable versions with peer reviews and mandatory 
> passing tests.
> Quality of published modules must not be compromised in the process.
>
>
> The goal for this discussion would be to draft the process to experiment.
> The process to experiment should be compatible with the current ones, 
> so that we can abandon it if we don't like the results.
> This is a tough requirement but I think it is achievable.
>
> The experiment results would be evaluated after some some (maybe 6 
> months) and could then be killed or expanded, depending on the findings.
>
> I have a few candidate repos I contribute to:
> - oca/l10n_portugal: very low activity, a few PRs and only two merged 
> modules.
> - oca/projects: medium/low activity
>
add oca/l10n_switzerland to it
>
>
>
> Would this be reasonable?
>
> Regards
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
> Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
> Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
>

Reference