Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Confusion about branch 9.0 in github
by
Guewen Baconnier
+1
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:53 PM, <Bidoul@pad.odoo-community.org> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt> wrote:
I used quotes, since I actually mean OCA "end users": developers/consultants using OCA code.Ok. Then as one of those people using code, I prefer to see all modules (ported AND unported) at once in the README.If the unported modules were not in the 9.0 branch, I would need to dig in previous branches to discover what was there before and is just a port away.And I have seen situations were people did not do that archeology exercise and independently reinvented modules that where in previous versions.That's why I continue to think giving adequate visibility to unported modules outweights the disadvantages mentioned in this thread.So I favor the status quo plus a clear explanation in https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/blob/master/tools/gen_addons_table.py#L68, including a link to Pedro's procedure for porting.-sbi
Reference
-
Confusion about branch 9.0 in github
byElico Corp, Eric Caudal-
Re: Confusion about branch 9.0 in github
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza -
Re: Confusion about branch 9.0 in github
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza