Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
by
Camptocamp France SAS, Sébastien Alix
I like the idea, so that means: - for module migration, we add a 'deprecated' flag for the earlier version/branch (not the target one as it's done now), but do we need to blacklist a migration from 15.0 to 14.0 or it's not necessary? - for blacklisted PRs, we still need to add a metadata on the target branch Le 12/10/2022 à 07:22, Mignon, Laurent a écrit : > What about a new 'deprecated' entry into the __manifest__.py file? > To specify/announce that an addon should not be migrated in version > 'n', we would add in version 'n-1' a 'deprecated' entry into the > manifest where the value explains why the addon is deprecated. > In this way, this kind of information could also be used by > other tools like the gen_addon_table to highlight such addons and > explain why in a structured way. In the same way, the gen_addo_readme > could also use this information to add a warning into the addon readme > ....
Reference
-
Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byCamptocamp France SAS, Sébastien Alix-
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byCamptocamp France SAS, Sébastien Alix -
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byAcsone SA/NV, Laurent Mignon -
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byAcsone SA/NV, Denis Roussel -
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza -
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byCamptocamp SA, Simone Orsi -
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
bySicurpharma Srl, Francesco Foresti -
Re: Is a new hidden folder '.oca/' in OCA repositories acceptable?
byCamptocamp SA, Yannick Payot
-