Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
by
Groupement Régional Alimentaire de Proximité, Sylvain LE GAL
Hi all,
We recently worked with Stephane Bidoul from Acsone, to improve the OCA bot that makes a lot of automated tasks on github. (https://github.com/OCA/oca-github-bot/)
FIY, the merge command syntax will change (PR). Previously, it was possible to say \ocabot merge. It will be now mandatory to mention the bump method to apply, among these 4 options : major, minor, patch, or nobump.
The nobump option should be used in rare cases. Most of the time, please follow the OCA conventions, regarding version numbers, available here.
Remark : if the command is incorrect, the bot will now answer that the command was wrong. Sample.
Another changes are available for the OCA bot :
* Possibility to automatically update history.rst file, using oca-towncrier and fragments files (PR). If you're interested in such a feature, please take a look at that new OCA command, available in maintainer-tools project.
Note 1 : There are also pending works to have the possibility to rebase the current pull request (PR) or to (auto) squash the commit of a PR. Feel free to contribute !
Note 2 : For people that have installed a custom ocabot for their custom repositories, new settings are available.
* Possibility to have approvals required configurable. (PR)
* Possibility to add options, calling oca-gen-addons-table, oca-gen-addon-readme, oca-gen-addon-icon (PR)
Kind regards.
Follow-Ups
-
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byTAKOBI s.r.l., Lorenzo Battistini. -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byAcsone SA/NV, Stéphane Bidoul -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byAGILE BUSINESS GROUP ITALIA SRL, Alex Comba. -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byCamptocamp SA, Simone Orsi -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byAcsone SA/NV, Stéphane Bidoul -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byOpen Source Integrators, Maxime Chambreuil -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byAcsone SA/NV, Laurent Mignon -
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now required
byEfatto.it di Sergio Corato, Sergio Corato